Sailing News
Fleet
Sails
Relocates to the "Y"
The sailboat company will occupy the
space previously housing the Larson
Motor Service. The new location on
Highway 371 & 200 just west of the
Casino will provide office space for the
Sailing School and indoor displays of
the new HUNTER Trailerable sailboats,
The Walker Bay boats, and the WindRider
trimaran sailboats. The outdoor display
space will showcase the large and small
used boats available on consignment. Tom
Beriou will continue to give sailing
lessons certified by the American
Sailing Association and offer the only
sailboat oriented facility in this
region. Tom and his wife Judy relocated
to the Walker area in 2000 and had his
office space near City Dock with the
sailboats located in several areas
throughout the city. "This will allow us
to have everything in one location with
plenty of space to grow.” Watch for the
official Grand Opening announcement
coming soon.
Visit www.fleetsails.com.
Feds’
Weather Information Could Go Dark
Do you want a seven-day weather forecast
for your ZIP code? Or hour-by-hour
predictions of the temperature, wind
speed, humidity and chance of rain? Or
weather data beamed to your cellphone?
That information is available for free
from the National Weather Service.
But under a bill pending in the U.S.
Senate, it might all disappear.
The bill, introduced last week by Sen.
Rick Santorum, R-Pa., would prohibit
federal meteorologists from competing
with companies such as AccuWeather and
The Weather Channel, which offer their
own forecasts through paid services and
free ad-supported Web sites.
Supporters say the bill wouldn’t hamper
the weather service or the National
Hurricane Center from alerting the
public to hazards — in fact, it exempts
forecasts meant to protect “life and
property.”
But critics say the bill’s wording is so
vague they can’t tell exactly what it
would ban.
“I believe I’ve paid for that data once.
... I don’t want to have to pay for it
again,” said Scott Bradner, a technical
consultant at Harvard University.
He says that as he reads the bill, a
vast amount of federal weather data
would be forced offline.
“The National Weather Service web site
would have to go away,” Bradner said.
“What would be permitted under this bill
is not clear — it doesn’t say. Even
including hurricanes.”
Nelson questions intention
The decision of what information to
remove would be up to Commerce Secretary
Carlos Gutierrez — possibly followed, in
the event of legal challenges, by a
federal judge.
A spokesman for Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla.,
said the bill threatens to push the
weather service back to a “pre-Internet
era” — a questionable move in light of
the four hurricanes that struck the
state last year. Nelson serves on the
Senate Commerce Committee, which has
been assigned to consider the bill.
“The weather service proved so
instrumental and popular and helpful in
the wake of the hurricanes. How can you
make an argument that we should pull it
off the Net now?” said Nelson’s
spokesman, Dan McLaughlin. “What are you
going to do, charge hurricane victims to
go online, or give them a pop-up ad?”
But Barry Myers, AccuWeather’s executive
vice president, said the bill would
improve public safety by making the
weather service devote its efforts to
hurricanes, tsunamis and other dangers,
rather than duplicating products already
available from the private sector.
“The National Weather Service has not
focused on what its core mission should
be, which is protecting other people’s
lives and property,” said Myers, whose
company is based in State College, Pa.
Instead, he said, “It spends hundreds of
millions of dollars a year, every day,
producing forecasts of ‘warm and
sunny.’”
Santorum made similar arguments April 14
when introducing his bill. He also said
expanded federal services threaten the
livelihoods of private weather
companies.
“It is not an easy prospect for a
business to attract advertisers,
subscribers or investors when the
government is providing similar products
and services for free,” Santorum said.
AccuWeather has been an especially vocal
critic of the weather service and its
parent agency, the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
The company has accused the federal
agencies of withholding data on
hurricanes and other hazards, and
failing to ensure that employees don’t
feed upcoming forecasts to favored
investors in farming and energy markets.
Weather service expands data
The rivalry intensified last year, when
NOAA shelved a 1991 policy that had
barred the weather agency from offering
services that private industry could
provide.
Also last year, the weather service
began offering much of its raw data on
the Internet in an easily digestible
format, allowing entrepreneurs and
hobbyists to write simple programs to
retrieve the information. At the same
time, the weather service’s own web
pages have become increasingly
sophisticated.
Combined, the trends threaten
AccuWeather’s business of providing
detailed weather reports based on an
array of government and private data.
AccuWeather’s 15,000 customers include
The Palm Beach Post, which uses the
company’s hurricane forecast maps on its
Web site, PalmBeachPost.com.
NOAA has taken no position on the bill.
But Ed Johnson, the weather service’s
director of strategic planning and
policy, said his agency is expanding its
online offerings to serve the public.
“If someone claims that our core mission
is just warning the public of hazardous
conditions, that’s really impossible
unless we forecast the weather all the
time,” Johnson said. “You don’t just
plug in your clock when you want to know
what time it is.”
Myers argued that nearly all consumers
get their weather information for free
through commercial providers, including
the news media, so there’s little reason
for the federal agency to duplicate
their efforts.
“Do you really need that from the NOAA
Web site?” he asked.
But some weather fans, such as Bradner,
say they prefer the federal site’s
ad-free format.
Another supporter of the weather
service’s efforts, Tallahassee database
analyst John Simpson, said the plethora
of free data becoming available could
eventually fuel a new industry of small
and emerging companies that would
repackage the information for public
consumption. He said a similar explosion
occurred in the 1990s, when
corporations’ federal securities filings
became freely available on the web.
Shutting off the information flow would
stifle that innovation and solidify the
major weather companies’ hold on the
market, Simpson said.
Santorum’s bill also would require the
weather service to provide “simultaneous
and equal access” to its information.
That would prevent weather service
employees from favoring some news
outlets over others, which Santorum and
Myers said has happened in some markets.
But it also could end the common
practice of giving one-on-one interviews
to individual reporters who have
questions about storms, droughts or
other weather patterns.
“What we want is to make sure that
whatever information is provided to one
source is provided to all,” Myers said.
But Johnson said it’s
importanst to answer reporters’
questions so the public receives
accurate information — especially when
lives are at stake.
“We are not interested in turning off
our telephones,” Johnson said. “I would
be concerned that that would actually be
dangerous.”